Problematising.

/Problematising.

Look, I know about all the arguments that [slash fanfic] – out of which a lot of [m/m romance] springs – allow for queer readings/reimaginings of existing canon and that’s great. I buy that argument, because what I’m buying into is the possibility of it. But in practice, no, and that extends to m/m romance in general. In practice what we have is a tremendous amount of stroke material featuring white cisgender traditionally attractive mostly able-bodied gay men, written by and for the consumption of straight cisgender women. And you can’t claim to me that this is all striking a blow for queer equality and have me take you seriously.

“Redeeming” gay romantic relationships is patronizing. Focusing on cisgender male erotic relationships to the exclusion of other queer identities because you find that stuff hot is erasure. Reducing the significance of characters to gender and sexuality – especially in the interest of depicting erotic sexual activity – is fetishizing. I’m not the first person to say this, but now I’m gonna be another one.

–Sunny Moraine on the problem with m/m.

2016-05-14T10:07:20+00:004th October, 2014|Tags: culture, m/m, quiltbag|

3 Comments

  1. iamanelfchild 3rd October, 2014 at 8:39 pm
  2. xerostra 3rd October, 2014 at 9:07 pm
  3. ivegotthekittens 3rd October, 2014 at 9:38 pm

Comments are closed.